Comments (2) |
| 1. Written by cruiseson on February 14, 2012 from austin, texas, US Well to me it seems very wrong to make the customer pay insurance on the equipment they are leasing IF it is the equipment they provided that malfunctioned. Excuse me! If I accidentally drop a milkshake on top od the main box I can understand that that is on me. If Direct TV's equipment fails internally thats on them. Without ANY insurance. If you are leasing a car and they lease you a brand new car for so much a month, and after 4 mo. the A/C compressor goes out because it was defective. You shouldn't have to pay anything for that. They should be obligated to lease you sound equipment. I'm not buying the insurance. If Direct TV's equipment fails internally and I was responsible for the cost of fixing it, then at the end of the 2 yr. lease I would have to return their leased equipment that I had paid to make work right. WTF! No way that is right! |
| 2. Written by Justsaying... on February 13, 2012 from louisville, kentucky, US Unless they have changed things which I doubt they have I believe The customer is responsible for their equipment failure also there is a service charge if service is needed. If the customer has the equipment replaced for any reason due to malfunction or upgrade it extends your contract for another 2 yrs. |
![]() |
| Comments on Direct TV Tried to upcharge me $89 for a plan to fix their own equipment | |
• Keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject. • Personal attacks will be deleted. • No Links or Scripts. |
Comments (2)